DENAIR · HVAC SERVICES ≋
A Phase 2 filter-condition photograph documents a visible component, not its system performance. Use the image to define an inspection question, then identify the unit and cleaning access on site.
At Icon Bay, inspection recorded duct and plenum defects alongside mould. The recorded plan included replacement and servicing, so it should not be reduced to a filter-wash story.
JVT paired FCU washing with insulation work and later joint-sealing and grille tasks. These entries show the boundary between cleaning, physical repair and unfinished installation.
Identify the FCU, filter or accessible duct section involved. The JVT source confirms FCU washing, not a complete cleaning of every ventilation branch.
Confirm how the unit can be reached. Icon Bay used minimal ceiling opening and had carry-in limits for duct sections; access affected the wider remedial scope.
Keep damaged insulation and duct defects as their own work items. At Icon Bay these were recorded findings, not conditions that washing was said to remove.
Document the serviced item and remaining tasks. JVT has no confirmed final grille installation or measured symptom outcome.
Does a dirty filter prove the whole problem?
No. The filter photograph shows condition only. Icon Bay recorded duct and plenum defects too; those require their own assessment and scope.
Can DENAIR promise a health or energy result from these photos?
No. The selected JVT and cross-property records do not establish health outcomes, energy savings or complete odour resolution. They establish documented work and component condition.
Share the affected units, visible condition, odour timing and access available. DENAIR can distinguish cleaning tasks from defects that need a separate correction.